Delayed Financial Disclosure: Mexico’s Recent Experience
نویسندگان
چکیده
This article documents a delay in the public release of Mexican international reserve data in the months before Mexico’s debt crisis at the end of 1994. The article establishes that in that year investors did not know the level of Mexican reserves before October; yet this lack of information did not seem to reduce investor confidence in the Mexican economy. The article does not establish whether the delay in releasing reserve data was due to logistical problems or to a government strategy. The possibility that the delay was strategic is evaluated by developing an economic model that captures some of the principal constraints facing the Mexican government in 1994 and that makes explicit the conflicting objectives of the government and investors. The model shows that in such an environment with private information, strategic delay can occur in equilibrium if investors are uncertain about the cause of the delay. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the Federal Reserve Bank of Minneapolis or the Federal Reserve System. After several years of strong economic performance, Mexico suddenly suffered a financial crisis at the end of 1994. Within one month, the value of the peso fell by more than 35 percent and Mexican international reserves were depleted to the point that default on dollar-indexed sovereign debt looked imminent. One issue that has surfaced since the crisis is whether the government strategically delayed the release of data on its holdings of international reserves in the months before the crisis. Why are international reserves significant? From the perspective of investors, the stock of international reserves provides valuable information about the expected return on their investments. Investors may construe a low stock of international reserves as bad news that signals an impending devaluation or a possible default on sovereign debt, and they may choose to liquidate their holdings of Mexican securities. In this article, we document that there was bad news about Mexican international reserves in 1994 and that the public release of this news was, in fact, delayed. We contend that this delay was within the range of the market’s expectation based on its experience with Mexican reporting practices, but that the delay might have been an equilibrium strategic decision by Mexican policymakers in an environment with private information. To show that the release of reserve data was delayed, we consider the various channels used to convey data to the public and show that there was delay in each of these channels. While this evidence makes a compelling case that there were delays, it does not make clear whether these delays were due to logistical problems or were strategic decisions to withhold bad news. To evaluate the possibility that delays were strategic, we develop a model that captures some of the principal constraints facing the Mexican government and that makes explicit the conflicting objectives of the government and foreign investors. Our model shows that strategic delay can occur in equilibrium as long as lenders are uncertain about the cause of the delay.
منابع مشابه
Trade and financial liberalization revisited. Mexico’s experience
In the middle of two crises, the first one in 1982 and a second one in 1986, Mexico initiated a new economic strategy, inaugurated with two important reforms: trade liberalization, and financial liberalization and deregulation. With the first reform the economic wanted to reposition Mexico in the international division of labor. With the second one they aimed at attracting capital inflows and m...
متن کاملMexico’s Crisis: Looking Back To Assess the Future
David M. Gould Senior Economist Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas In early December 1994, the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and many private economists were predicting that Mexico’s real gross domestic product (GDP) would grow by at least 3.8 percent in 1995. Mexico appeared to be on the fast track to economic growth and stability. For the first time in many years, i...
متن کاملCan External Monitoring Affect Corporate Financial Reporting and Disclosure? Evidence from Earnings and Expectations Management
SYNOPSIS: This study examines whether financial analysts and institutional investors play a disciplinary role in monitoring corporate financial reporting and disclosure. Using a sample of firms that meet or marginally beat analysts’ forecasts, likely through upward earnings management and downward expectations management, this study shows that managers’ use of the two tactics is associated with...
متن کاملFinancial disclosure and political selection: Evidence from India∗
We study the effect of financial disclosure on the selection of politicians, exploiting the staggering of Indian state assembly elections to identify the effect of disclosure laws. We document a 13 percentage point increase in exit of winning candidates post-disclosure, indicating that disclosure has a large effect on politician self-selection. This selection coincides with higher probability o...
متن کاملBoard and auditor interlocks and voluntary disclosure in annual reports
This paper explores the role o f the interlock ties of the board of directors and the external auditors in facilitating cross-firm diffusion of voluntary disclosure practices. Using data from 149 companies listed on the Dutch stock exchange, we investigated the relationship between a firm ’s voluntary disclosure of financial and non-financial performance measures in its annual report and the in...
متن کامل